Runcore Pro Iv 2.5 Sata Ii Ssd For Mac

Runcore Pro Iv 2.5 Sata Ii Ssd For Mac Rating: 4,1/5 3337 votes

24 comments: 7j said. I guess the only difference between the 2.5' SATA drives for macs is the drive cloning software? It would make since for Runcore to target Apple users since they apparently account for some 90 percent of spending on $999+ computers. These would be the people who would want to pay for Runcore's speed. Actually, I just opened a fun (expensive looking) package myself recently. The HP 2140 I got for three hundred USD! I'm really liking the brushed-metal top and slim design, If feels much classier than my old $1000 dell.

  1. Runcore Pro Iv 2.5 Sata Ii Ssd For Mac Free
2.5

I might want to replace the HP's pci-e wifi-n card with a Runcore pata ssd for os use. That would really make it fly! (It came w/ 2gigs of ram so Im good there) Then I can leave the 2.5' sata for the upcoming 640GB Seagate laptop hard drive. I won't even have to bother modding it to keep wireless since I have a free ExpressCard 54 slot which can be used for a wifi-n card.

I really love you site JKK. It makes me so excited about Netbooks. I got my brother to order the ASUS EEE PC T91 on your recommendation!

Runcore Pro Iv 2.5 Sata Ii Ssd For Mac Free

Boy it looks small!!! Can't wait for the live session!

I have been recommending the Runcore Pro IV to every buying a netbook. I agree that they are the best. I should have read enadget first. No 640GB drive for me.

I'm going strait for a 1TB (2.5in) drive! (In addition to a RunCore Pro IV 50mm PCI-E SSD!) Microsoft doesn't like hybrid storage for a reason.

IT'S FANTASTIC! Try beating 1.128 Terabytes in a 1KG package! Who needs CULV when you have RunCore? Anonymous said. Here's the Link: I hope my drive socket is deep enough. Anonymous said.

Nothing new, heard about it in May. Speed will be good but i think than the bottleneck will be the chipset and the cpu in the netbooks and so on. 7j, you can't use pcie SSDs on any other devices than Eee PCs and Dell Mini 9. Others, like your HP, doesn't support PATA/SATA over pcie connector. Anonymous said.

So will the 1.8' 5mm PATA Zif be compatible with the Fujistu U820 / U2010 said. It should work with U820.

But we will test soon anyway. Anonymous said. Jkk, any idea if these 1.8 drives will work with vaio p? (and did you have a video on how to replace that drive, I remember reading about it on your site, but I cant seem to fiid it) Andy said. Just to clear up the newly annouced drives on engadget are 12.5mm not 9.5mm so no netbook love yet! JKK, any idea if a Broadcom HD video accelerator will work with the HP? I could just use the main 2.5' bay for the ssd.

The HDD can be external. Sony Vaio P owners will be very happy, stay tuned to JKK's site:) said. The 50mm T-style doesn't say it's mini-PCI. Is it and therefore would it fit the Dell Mini 9 I just ordered? It would be great to get the extra speed for my Hackintosh. T-style is mini pci-e for Dell Mini 9.

But it only fits to non 3G models. I'd be cautious about getting the 1.8' ZIF drives. The previous generation of Runcore 1.8' ZIF SSDs (based on the JMicron controller) has huge compatibility problems due to the connector or included cable. As for the 2.5' SATA drives? Are they NUTS?

Should I spend MORE for a slower, lower capacity drive (say 64GB for $289) from a relatively no-name manufacturer with stock availability and product problems OR should I spend LESS for a faster X25-M, higher capacity drive (80GB for $225) from Intel? Hmm, but Intel X25-M has good sustained read speed, other than that it's not so good.

Good news about the 1.8' Pro IV there is no need for extra cables or instructions on how to possition the drive because the problems are all fixed. Samples are on the way to JKK now so keep any eye out for some good in depth reviews soon.

Sata

Runcore Will said. The X25-M actually has slightly lower sustained read/write speeds compared to the drives based on the Indillix, Samsung or JMicron controllers but has much faster small block random read/write speeds which is more important for real world performance. Take a look at SSD reviews from sites like Anandtech to see how the X25-M compares to other SSDs. Runcore, what about pricing? Last week Intel dropped their prices significantly and other SSD manufacturers (like OCZ) are also starting to do the same. Will these new drives be price competitive?

Promo 12 12 wireless mouse for gaming mirip fantech raigor for mac. Anonymous said. I dont really see what the big deal is about Runcore. It performs very similar to other Indilinx controller based drives like the OCZ Vertex. From review sites which review PC hardware, most sites recommend Intel SSDs as a better performing option in most real world tests. Vertex and other indilinx drives lead only in a few synthetic tests (in particular sequential writes).

See reviews at techreport, anandtech and pcper. Yep, 2,5 sata ones have similar specs but sequentals don't mean nothing on computers that has top bus speed from 60 to 120. ( most umpcs and netbooks ) Random write and low latency is what we want. And smaller form factors. 1.8 and pcie ones can't be found from those brands Anonymous said. JKK are you sure you can't use a Runcore pci-e ssd in a mac mini (not the new ION/nvidia one but the one with an intel 945 chipset)?

I don't see pci-e pata/sata slot on it. Let me get this straight so the 1.8' will fit the Asus EEE901? Is so that's great! Anonymous said.

On their site its written that the.

Please Note:. If you're interested in a product, please feel free to call ahead to verify availability. If the part you are looking for is not listed as available at any of our store locations, we may be able to special order it for you. Please note the SKU # above and contact your local Milwaukee PC store. Store Location Quanity Available Appleton 0 Business Solutions - Mequon 0 Fond Du Lac 0 Greenfield 0 Kenosha 0 Manitowoc 0 Menomonee Falls 0 Mequon 0 Milwaukee - Central 0 Milwaukee - Downtown 0 Milwaukee - South 0 Oconomowoc 0 Oshkosh 0 Racine 0 Sheboygan 0 Shorewood 0 Stevens Point 0 Waukesha 0 West Bend 0.

Posted on